NAV: AutoBeta Home > AutoBeta Popular content >

second instance Learn more about second instance

AutoBeta has retrieved the following content about second instance for you across the entire web.

• 

  Lost! Court final judgment: Tesla sales fraud "return one for one compensation"

  Tesla was sued by the car owner for "suspected sales fraud". The court finally ruled that Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd. lost the case and needed to return the car at the original price and compensate the owner for the purchase of 778200 yuan. According to the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability dispute of Li Zhilong and Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, the party Li Zhilong (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Li") spent 778200 yuan to buy Tesla Model X, and later found that the car had inconsistent model certificates of drive motors, so Mr. Li sold Tesla cars (Wenzhou).

  Tesla 2021-06-22
• 

  BMW caught fire while driving, and the owner sued for 190000 yuan.

  Recently, the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability disputes of Guangzhou Baoyue Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., BMW (China) Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, rejected the above and upheld the original verdict. this judgment is final. The course of the case: in March 2011, Xiao bought a BMW off-road vehicle in Guangzhou Baoyue for 709000 yuan. in the subsequent use process, the plaintiff used the vehicle according to the vehicle manual and maintained it regularly. In September 2018, the car suddenly smoked and caught fire while driving on the road, and was finally burned into an empty shell. In October 2018,.

  BMW 2021-08-22
• 

  Land Rover accuses Jiangling of turning defeat into victory! Lu Feng X7 plagiarized range Rover Aurora Patent was ruled invalid

  On December 16, 2019, the Supreme people's Court of the people's Republic of China rejected the second-instance retrial application of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd., upholding the second-instance judgment of the Beijing Supreme people's Court, according to the China referee Writing website. Lu Feng X7 was found to have copied the aurora design of Land Rover. Range Rover Aurora made its debut at the 2010 Guangzhou Motor Show, while Jiangling Holdings' Lufeng X7 made its debut at the 2014 Guangzhou Motor Show. The biggest highlight of the Land Wind X7 is its appearance, because the Land Wind X7 is highly similar to the Land Rover Aurora, and the price is much cheaper than the Land Rover Aurora.

  Land wind X7 2020-01-09
• 

  The second-hand Mercedes-Benz sold as a new car, and the rights court ordered the car dealer to pay 3.35 million yuan in compensation for two years.

  The imported second-hand Mercedes-Benz was sold as a new car, and the court ruled that there was no compensation at first instance. After the car owner appealed and provided strong evidence, the final seller was awarded 3.35 million yuan in compensation. Recently, the China Consumer Daily, which is in charge of the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration and sponsored by the China Consumer Association, disclosed the incident of protecting the rights of Mercedes-Benz owners. On November 1, 2017, Mr. Liang signed a "car sales contract" with Shenzhen Qianxing Technology Company to buy a black 17 Mercedes-Benz GLS 450 with a net price of 1.117 million yuan (excluding vehicle license fees). On the day of signing the contract, Mr. Liang Qianxing Technology Company paid a deposit.

  Automobile sales 2020-03-31
• 

  A public apology and a compensation of 5 million! Dongfeng Co., Ltd. won the lawsuit against Beijing car thousands of miles away.

  On August 25, the official account "NI+ Planet" on Dongfeng Nissan announced that Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd. won over Beijing Auto Qianli Interactive Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "che Qianli"). Dongfeng Nissan in "Justice will not be absent!" Dongfeng Co., Ltd. v. Beijing che Qianli Internet infringement case won the second instance, "the article said:"

  Dongfeng Company Limited Qianli Co. Ltd. Automobile Dongfeng Automobile judgment Video Qijun second instance Laboratory Bull cart account experiment 2023-08-25
• 

  The latest result of the one-for-three refund case: Tesla's application for retrial was rejected

  Today, Mr. Han, a party to Tesla's "withdrawal of one indemnity for three" case, said in a personal Weibo post: the Beijing Municipal higher people's Court has ruled in accordance with the law to reject Tesla's application for retrial, and the case has been finally concluded for more than three years. Reviewing the related events, the car owner, Mr. Han, spent 379700 yuan on Tesla Guan.com in 2019.

  Tex Tesla vehicle company Hanxian car owner first instance accident court judgment reputation right of reputation case Beijing structure 2023-03-28
• 

  Award a compensation of 7 million! Geely v. Weimar won the first instance of infringement of trade secrets

  After four years, Geely Motor and Weimar Automobile infringement of trade secrets case finally ushered in new progress. According to reports, the Shanghai higher people's Court has made a first-instance judgment on Geely and Weimar's 2.1 billion yuan intellectual property dispute, and the judgment of the first instance of the case was issued in September.

  Automobile Weimar Geely Group drawings case Court dispute Shanghai judgment holding first instance Trade Trade Secret Secret 2022-12-26
• 

  Tesla won the final case of "chip reduction", and the car owner's request for "core change" was rejected.

  On March 2, 2020, a car owner Tesla posted on Weibo that the configuration of the upgraded after-drive version of the domestic standard Model 3 had been downgraded and that the car was equipped with a vehicle controller code-named 1462554 (FSD chip HW3.0), but when the owner removed the vehicle controller, he found it was code-named 1465773 (FSD chip HW2.5). Compared with the HW2.5 chip, the computing power of the HW3.0 chip is 21 times higher than that of the HW2.5 chip.

  Tesla 2021-08-06
• 

  Admitting to fabricating "brake failure", Wenzhou Tesla lost control of the car owner publicly apologized

  The closely watched "Wenzhou Tesla brake failure" incident ushered in the latest progress. On May 9, a blogger named "Mobile user 3042983165" posted an apology letter on the social platform: "admitting to fabricating the truth is stepping on the wrong pedal". In the apology letter, the blogger said: he is 2020.

  Tesi Tesla car owner sir madam judgment company brake Wenzhou accident vehicle first instance platform incident second instance 2022-05-10
• 

  The BMW hybrid car fire was found to be a quality problem, and the car owner received a compensation of 400000 yuan.

  The man sued brilliance BMW and its dealers for spontaneous combustion when he bought a BMW hybrid, and finally got 400000 yuan in compensation. According to the judge's documents, Wang bought a BMW hybrid car on October 23, 2019, with a total price tax of 426780 yuan, of which the vehicle purchase tax was 49098.

  BMW seat fire vehicle quality court brilliance trace car cause Qingdao Qingdao investigation driving identification 2022-08-17
• 

  The second trial upheld the original verdict! Tesla wins the lawsuit against "5 million fans of Douyin".

  The result of the judgment of the second instance was announced, and the result of the judgment was upheld, and the judgment was final. In other words, this case ended in Tesla's victory. In June 2022, Tesla sued "Boss Cai" for infringement of reputation. On October 31 of the same year, the result of the first instance of the case was announced, and the judgment showed that the court recognized

  Boss Tess Tesla video judgment platform company content friend case court result infringement second instance event 2023-03-14
• 

  Tesla sued goods to play the final victory! Product play: will be submitted for retrial

  On June 13th, Pinplay issued a statement on its official Weibo on the verdict of the second instance in Tesla's case. The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate people's Court has made a final judgment on the infringement of reputation by Beijing Pinci Interactive Technology Co., Ltd., the operator of Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., the statement said.

  Tesi Tesla judgment company court article limited limited Shanghai reputation official platform people's court people reputation right 2023-06-13
• 

  The Tuge car has been fully recovered and the office address has been vacated.

  Since November last year, Tuge shared cars have been frequently reported as delinquent deposits by users, and the record of 1500 yuan deposit in APP has disappeared. Previously, the official customer service responded that the fault would be repaired in the near future, but at present, the Tuge hotline has indicated that "there is no such business number", all the shared cars in the parking lots have been removed, and the company's office address has been emptied. Industry and commerce responded that Tuge did not go bankrupt. It is understood from the relevant channels that the Beijing Court trial Information Network has intensively made public 82 judgments of Beijing Tuge Technology Co., Ltd., all of which are lease contract disputes arising from the failure to refund the deposit on time. Among the judgments made public in June this year, 41 were judgments of first instance.

  Automobile 2019-06-19
• 

  Verdict! Tesla returns one to three!

  The owner, Mr. Han, reflected in Tesla's online purchase of a Tesla officially certified second-hand car, Model S P85, and was told by the sales before purchase that there were no major accidents, blisters, fires and structural damage in the Tesla certified car, but Mr. Han always found some minor problems in the car and needed to frequently go to the Tesla service center for repair. after passing the third-party inspection, the vehicle C-pillar and rear wing were cut and welded. Tesla was sued in anger. Since the protection of his rights in August 19, Mr. Han has waited for the court's ruling: return one to three. Today, Han, the owner of Tesla, said in a post, "I won the case, Beijing No.2 Middle Court Wei."

  Tesla 2021-09-17
• 

  Buy Shijie equipped with "shanzhai" stereo, the second trial upheld the original verdict: refund one indemnity three indemnity 1.859 million

  The country's first audio fraud constitutes a second-instance judgment in a vehicle fraud case, and the court upheld the original verdict: the company returned 619800 yuan to Chen Bo for car purchase and paid 1.8594 million yuan in compensation. In March 2015, Mr. Chen of Chongqing spent 619800 yuan on a Porsche Macan from Chongqing Haoda Automobile sales Co., Ltd. in June 2017, the owner of the car, Mr. Chen, was ready to sell the car and drive to the used car market for inspection. When he found that the vehicle's "BOSE original stereo" label automatically fell off, after professional appraisal, Mr. Chen learned that the so-called BOSE stereo was a fake. It.

  Porsche 2019-04-25
• 

  New development of Hangzhou Mercedes-Benz 4S store refund one-for-three incident: car owners get 2.7 million yuan

  When the imported Mercedes-Benz CLS bought in 700000 was licensed, it was found that the tires and wheels were privately replaced by the 4S store into a smaller size. The car owner sued the 4S store after negotiation with the 4S store, demanding a return of one for three. The court ruled that the Mercedes-Benz 4S store constituted a sales fraud and refunded one to three by the car price, with a cumulative sum of nearly 2.7 million yuan. 4S shop refused to appeal, and the court of second instance decided to support the refund of one for three treatment, rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict. Recently, Zhejiang online reporter contacted the owner of the case to represent the lawyer that at present the Mercedes-Benz 4S store has fulfilled its judgment obligations and 2.7 million yuan has been settled. Another successful case of refund and compensation for three-dimensional rights.

  Mercedes-Benz ten thousand yuan 2019-04-19
• 

  The car dealer concealed a major accident, and the man got a compensation of 1.1 million yuan for buying second-hand Audi.

  At present, the second-hand car market has not yet formed a norm, accident cars, water-soaked cars are no longer sold as boutique cars, even officially certified second-hand cars can not avoid this situation. Mr. Wang of Ningbo, Zhejiang encountered this situation, confirming the identity of the owner and the condition of the vehicle many times before buying the used car, but there were serious safety risks after the purchase, and there was the fact of concealing a major accident. He angrily sued the second-hand car dealer to the court. Last year, Mr. Wang took a fancy to an Audi A6L in Ningbo Mingya second-hand Brokerage Co., Ltd. when he bought the car, the salesman and the original owner Hu said, the right front of the Audi A6L.

  Audi A6L 2020-12-14
• 

  The "new" million imported Mercedes-Benz unexpectedly had an accident abroad. Court: merchants refund one for three.

  Mercedes-Benz is one of the luxury car brands that people have always been keen on, and it is basically a happy event for ordinary people in China, but Zhang from Henan encountered the "fraud" of Mercedes-Benz merchants. Zhang (owner) of Henan spent more than 1 million yuan on a model GLS450 Mercedes-Benz in Zhengzhou Union Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. (shop owner). Problems occurred frequently within a few days of driving the car, and the owner found that it was an accident only after identification. The owner took the shop to court, and finally the court ruled that the merchant "refunded one for three." August 16, 2017, Zhang from Henan Province in Zhengzhou Automobile Trading Co., Ltd.

  Brand new Mercedes-Benz 2019-02-22
• 

  A vice minister of automobile brand operation was sentenced for bribery / bribery.

  Recently, the people's Court of Chaoyang City in Beijing disclosed the Criminal judgment of the first instance of Xu's bribery and the Criminal judgment of the first instance of Li's bribery. The verdict showed that BAIC New Energy Marketing Xu, as a state functionary, took advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and illegally accepted property from others with his family Li, in a huge amount; in order to seek illegitimate interests, he collaborated with others to give property to state functionaries, and his behavior constituted the crime of accepting bribes and offering bribes, and he was sentenced to seven years in prison and fined 300000 yuan in accordance with the law. After investigation, the defendant Xu went through Company B from December 2018 to July 2020.

  BAIC new energy 2022-02-10
• 

  7500 yuan for 200000 Mercedes-Benz sellers do not deliver goods! Final judgment: compensation of 196000 yuan

  Some time ago, a shopping dispute over a used car auction triggered a heated discussion among netizens. A user reported that he killed a second-hand Mercedes-Benz car with the original price of 204000 yuan at a price of 7500 yuan on Taobao auction. However, the seller then contacted him and said that the price was mismarked and hoped that he could get a refund. The user refused a refund and urged delivery several times. Subsequently, the two sides went to court on the matter. Recently, the incident has finally come to an end. According to the court documents, the Chengdu Intermediate people's Court of Sichuan Province issued a final judgment on the case, and the company was awarded 196500 yuan in compensation to Mr. Liu. Related matters.

  Mercedes Benz 2021-11-16